[X] My Assistant

- Type:

- Attribute

- Description:

Someone who doesn't understand or doesn't know what is being done to them/ something they are doing is sexual.

- Examples:

Example 1

Example 2 (First 30 pages)

Example 3 (First 8 pages)

Example 4 (pages 5-33, 91-112, 151-169, 185-208)

Example 5

Example 6

- Why I feel this tag is needed:

The tag of clueless could apply to oblivious, naive, gullible, drugged, sleeping, unconscious, unaware, tricked, time stop, and in rarer cases drunk and mind controlled themes. It's a broader term to help someone like myself find the categories they seek, without needing to look for very specific terms that may or may not return favorable results.

However, this does not apply to "stealth sex" situations where a third party is clueless to what is happening right besides them or in front of them. Unless the third party is involved in some way, but are not aware of their involvement.

Did you even used the tag or looked at the complaints on the NTR tag?

I occasionally post questions there regarding some borderline cases... not too often as it is not my cup of tea. Why?

Ah, really need this tag.

[K-てん] 性知識0の彼女はエロガキの精液便所 [英訳]
http://ehentaihip.com/g/1675934/7afdea2ba8/

[K-てん] 性知識0の彼女とその母親はエロガキの精液便所 [英訳]
http://ehentaihip.com/g/1766993/c2130c18af/

[K-てん] 性知識0の僕のお姉ちゃんはエロガキ達の精液便所 いつも僕を守ってくれる大好きなお姉ちゃんが… [英訳]
http://ehentaihip.com/g/2083918/d1ba1d3749/

This post has been edited by overpo: Apr 17 2022, 01:25

I think at once point there was an "Ignorance" tag which doesn't exist anymore.

A participant engaging in sexual acts while displaying lack of basic sexual education by being unaware of what sex is, that it is a "big deal", or having been tricked that what they are doing is "not sex"

Maybe we just remove the "big deal" part?

Imo definition must be specific enough that it doesn't just cross into mind control, drugs, emotionless sex, other tags that may induce situation where the sex just happens without the participants knowledge.

I think its sort of a requirement the participant must be unimpaired and aware of the act. Otherwise its just a different tag like mind control, sleeping, drugs, drunk, or emotionless.

"An unimpaired participant is initially tricked or forced in a sexual act while not considering it being sexual."

Most of the context happens in the first few panels to set up the act and it can diverge from there, maybe just having question marks appear over their heads counts as sufficient?

The cluelessness can last the entire thing, but what really matters is that the context was there initially. Even if they become less clueless halfway in.

While I think that the proposal is too broad it has a concept that hasn't been tagged already. I suggest to narrow it down to "person doing a sexual act without knowing that it's a sexual act (due to naivete or hypnosis)".